Journal cover Journal topic
Drinking Water Engineering and Science An interactive open-access journal

Journal metrics

  • CiteScore<br/> value: 0.79 CiteScore
    0.79
  • SNIP value: 0.813 SNIP 0.813
  • SJR value: 0.228 SJR 0.228
  • IPP value: 0.719 IPP 0.719
Drink. Water Eng. Sci., 6, 1-10, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/dwes-6-1-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
 
11 Jan 2013
Natural organic matter removal by ion exchange at different positions in the drinking water treatment lane
A. Grefte1, M. Dignum2, E. R. Cornelissen3, and L. C. Rietveld1 1Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
2Waternet, P.O. Box 94370, 1090 GJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3KWR Watercycle Research Institute, P.O. Box 1072, 3430 BB Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
Abstract. To guarantee a good water quality at the customers tap, natural organic matter (NOM) should be (partly) removed during drinking water treatment. The objective of this research was to improve the biological stability of the produced water by incorporating anion exchange (IEX) for NOM removal. Different placement positions of IEX in the treatment lane (IEX positioned before coagulation, before ozonation or after slow sand filtration) and two IEX configurations (MIEX® and fluidized IEX (FIX)) were compared on water quality as well as costs. For this purpose the pre-treatment plant at Loenderveen and production plant Weesperkarspel of Waternet were used as a case study. Both, MIEX® and FIX were able to remove NOM (mainly the HS fraction) to a high extent. NOM removal can be done efficiently before ozonation and after slow sand filtration. The biological stability, in terms of assimilable organic carbon, biofilm formation rate and dissolved organic carbon, was improved by incorporating IEX for NOM removal. The operational costs were assumed to be directly dependent of the NOM removal rate and determined the difference between the IEX positions. The total costs for IEX for the three positions were approximately equal (0.0631 € m−3), however the savings on following treatment processes caused a cost reduction for the IEX positions before coagulation and before ozonation compared to IEX positioned after slow sand filtration. IEX positioned before ozonation was most cost effective and improved the biological stability of the treated water.

Citation: Grefte, A., Dignum, M., Cornelissen, E. R., and Rietveld, L. C.: Natural organic matter removal by ion exchange at different positions in the drinking water treatment lane, Drink. Water Eng. Sci., 6, 1-10, https://doi.org/10.5194/dwes-6-1-2013, 2013.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share