Drinking Water Engineering and Science www.drink-water-eng-sci.net 1996-9457 1996-9465 2 2 2009 10.5194/dwes-2-41-2009 http://www.drink-water-eng-sci.net/2/41/2009/ http://www.drink-water-eng-sci.net/2/41/2009/dwes-2-41-2009.html http://www.drink-water-eng-sci.net/2/41/2009/dwes-2-41-2009.pdf 41 47 2009-08-26 An innovative treatment concept for future drinking water production: fluidized ion exchange – ultrafiltration – nanofiltration – granular activated carbon filtration Sheng Li s.li@tudelft.nl S. G. J. Heijman J. Q. J. C. Verberk J. C. van Dijk Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Kiwa Water Research, P.O. Box 1072, 3430 BB Nieuwegein, The Netherlands A new treatment concept for drinking water production from surface water has been investigated on a pilot scale. The treatment concept consists of fluidized ion exchange (FIEX), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), and granular activated carbon filtration (GAC). The FIEX process removed calcium and other divalent cations; the UF membrane removed particles and micro-organisms; and the NF membrane and GAC removed natural organic matter (NOM) and micro-pollutants. This study focused on the prevention of fouling of the UF and scaling of the NF and investigated the overall removal of micro-pollutants by the treatment concept. The results of the experiments showed that in 14 days of continuous operation at a flux of 65 l/h m² the UF performance was stable with the FIEX pre-treated feed water without the aid of a coagulant. The scaling of the NF was also not observed even at 97% recovery. Different micro-pollutants were spiked in the NF feed water and their concentrations in the effluent of NF and GAC were measured. The combination of NF and GAC removed most of the micro-pollutants successfully, except for the very polar substances with a molecular weight lower than 100 Daltons. Abrahamse, A. J., Lipreau, C., Li, S., et al.: Removal of divalent cations reduces fouling of ultrafiltration membranes, J. Membrane Sci., 323, 153–158, 2008. Aoustin, E., Schäfer, A. I., Fane, A. G., et al.: Ultrafiltration of natural organic matter, Separation and Purification Technology, 22–23, 63–78, 2001. Cho, J., Amy, G., and Pellegrino, J.: Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane, J. Membrane Sci., 164, 89–110, 2000. Cohen-Stuart, M. A., Fleer, G. J., Lyklema, J., et al.: Adsorption of ions, polyelectrolytes and proteins, Adv. Colloid and Interface Sci., 34, 477–535, 1991. Heijman, S. G. J. and Hopman, R.: Activated carbon filtration in drinking water production, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 151, 303–310, 1999. Heijman, S. G. J., Vantieghem, M., Raktoe, S., et al.: Blocking of capillaries as fouling mechanism for dead-end ultrafiltration, J. Membrane Sci., 287, 119–125, 2007. Hong, S. and Elimelech, M.: Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes, J. Membrane Sci., 132, 159–181, 1997. Kabsch-Korbutowicz, M., Majewska-Nowak, K., and Winnicki, T.: Analysis of membrane fouling in the treatment of water solutions containing humic acids and mineral salts, Desalination, 126, 179–185, 1999. Katsoufidou, K., Yiantsios, S. G., Karabelas, A. J., et al.: A study of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acids and flux recovery by backwashing: Experiments and modeling, J. Membrane Sci., 266, 40–50, 2005. Kweon, J. H. and Lawler, D. F.: Fouling mechanisums in the integrated system with softening and ultarfiltration, Water Res., 38, 4164–4172, 2004. Li, Q. and Elimelech, M.: Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: measurements and mechanisms, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 4683–4693, 2004. Makadissy, G., Croue, J. P., Buisson, H., et al.: Organic matter fouling of ultrafiltration membranes, Water Sci. Technol.: Water Supply, 3(5–6), 175–182, 2003. Paassen, J., Wessels, P., van der Meer, W., et al.: 97% recovery nanofiltration: cheaper with less concentrate, MDIW, Muhlheim an der Ruhr, 2002. Schäfer, A. I., Fane, A. G., anf Waite, T. D.: Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: Removal, fouling and the influence of multivalent ions, Desalination, 118, 109–122, 1998. Seidel, A. and Elimelech, M.: Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: applications for fouling control, J. Membrane Sci., 203, 245–255, 2002. Song, L. and Singh, G.: Influence of various monovalent cations and calcium ion on the colloidal fouling potential, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 289, 479–487, 2005. van Dijk, J. C. and van der Kooij, D.: Water Quality 21 research programme for water supplies in The Netherlands, Water Sci. Technol.: Water Supply, 4(5–6), 181–188, 2004. Verliefde, A. R. D., Heijman, S. G. J., Cornelissen, E. R., et al.: Influence of hydrophobicity and charge on removal of trace organic pollutants with high pressure membanes, The AWWA Water Quality and Technology conference, Denver, 2006. Wei, Y. and Zydney, A. L.: Effects of solution environment on humic acid fouling during microfiltration, Desalination, 122, 63–76, 1999. Wei, Y. and Zydney, A. L.: Humic acid fouling during ultrafiltration, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 5043–5050, 2000.